-
MPL vs CPL basics
CPL is the traditional pathway with ~200 hours of actual aircraft time before type rating; MPL blends limited real flying (about 70 hours) with extensive airline-specific simulator training (roughly 140–160 hours) leading directly to multi-crew airline ops on a specific type.
-
Career flexibility and constraints
CPL offers broad flexibility across general aviation, charters, and varied types; MPL ties you to multi-crew airline operations on the designated type and airline, limiting transfers until higher experience/ATPL milestones are met.
-
Rationale for MPL in India
DGCA convened an expert panel to study MPL implementation amid rapid fleet growth and a projected pilot need, aiming to accelerate cockpit readiness and align training with airline operations while keeping CPL and MPL concurrent if approved.
-
Training infrastructure implications
MPL’s heavy simulator reliance requires robust full‑flight simulator capacity and airline–ATO partnerships; India would need added sim slots given existing demand from airline training and CPL conversions.
-
Exam reforms in discussion
Proposals include making ATPL exams on‑demand and removing the ATPL viva to speed CPL-to-ATPL progression and relieve captain shortages; details remain proposed and subject to DGCA decisions.
-
Cost and timeline contours
Total spend for MPL vs CPL can be similar, but cash-flow patterns differ; abroad training costs vary with currency and lesson competency, while Indian per-hour rates are more predictable but can change with payment timing and fuel prices.